The Shining Wit:

The blog of Tom Mendelsohn, putting the 'noise' into 'signal-to-noise ratio'. You love it, or at least know of its existence.

0 notes

Anonymous asked: Your review of 'The Londoner' is simply dreadful. You are a terrible writer and judging from your tone I can only assume that you have zero social skills/life/friends. Though you claim the long legged Londoner to be.. "half a dozen notches less pretty than she believes she is" I'm pretty sure you'd probably wet yourself if you ever came face to face with her. Or any girl, in fact.

You’ll never get to sleep with her if you stay anonymous, you know?

0 notes

Anonymous asked: Your post on The Londoner sums up why I love the internet. It's full of failed journalists who can't understand why nobody has recognised the genius of their sanctimonious, pretentious ramblings when actually, they are yet to learn that being sesquipedalian is not the same as being talented. But nice try.

The substance of this insult seems to be ‘I don’t understand many long words, and that has forced me to make my anonymous aggression heard’.

0 notes

Anonymous asked: Do you need a hug? Are you sad your cat hasn't licked your prick lately? Your blog from May 8th was uncalled for so I have to wonder if you are recently were rejected and needed to lash out or something similar. It really was nothing more than a WTF whinny rant.

I think you need to work on your one-liners.

0 notes

Anonymous asked: Dear Shining tWit: After your review of "The Londoner" blog, it sounded like you were in an agitated quandary over whether to clean the resulting crazy off your screen & keyboard or, not. I'm betting that you went with 'not" since its doubtful the warranty would cover that bit o' perverted cybertoss anyway. As for you being a "lover, not a fighter," please, spanking your monkey to death qualifies neither for love nor, fighting.

Gosh, that was gibberish. ‘Shining Wit’ is a spoonerism. See if you can ‘get’ it.

1 note

Questions to which the answer is ‘Oh god yes’, #1: is this the most objectionable blog on the Internet?

Let me introduce you to The Londoner, ‘a lifestyle blog’, if you’ll believe the twee cursive subtitle. It is quite uniquely dreadful.

A glossily hipstagrammed opus marking the absolute apotheosis of post-everything vacuity, it is a towering monument to the emptiness of existence; a sleek Weblog-of-Dorian-Gray masking a black soul slowly fragmenting on some hidden hard-drive partition in its awful curator’s vastly expensive Macbook Air.

The blog is a collage of vogueishly prepared nibblies basking in the handsome glow of tasteful iPhone camera aftereffect, shiny rich-person arsehole-couture draped over an elongated 21st Century sloane-borg with a magic Kate Middleton backcomb, and myriad tantalising glimpses of butter-tanned rear-end.

It drips shi-shi awfulness like a dying cormorant drips crude oil, its hundreds of interminable backposts boiling down to photograph after photograph of a slender, leggy, mumfaced social media executive, who is half a dozen notches less pretty than the endless hand-on-hip Tatler model poses might suggest she believes she is. Like, there’s no actual chance she eats any of the food she’s fucking well photographing, because if she did, she wouldn’t be so pleased to display so many of her buttocks with such peach-furred prominence.

It has categories for easy navigation. These categories are sensational: ‘recipes’, ‘fashion’, ‘travel’, ‘restaurants’, ‘lifestyle’, ‘DIY’ and ‘the slow heat-death of every cultural achievement humanity once held dear’. ‘DIY’ is a bit misleading; it features exactly as much muffin-baking nail-art dickery as all the rest of the site.

In ‘lifestyle’, meanwhile, our protagonist visits Downing Street, at which she wears a dress over the course of many, many pictures. She doesn’t explain why she’s there, but she does confess to be excited about it, as she’s a ‘die hard Tory girl’, which is a lovely little bonus factlet. In ‘recipes’, there’s a divine recipe for ‘slutty brownies’. The only evidence she’s eaten any of them is the full-body spoon-licking pose she strikes at the end of the entry, because she’s a vapid asscloud of hairspray and ugly Italian shoes.

In fact, the entire category structure is misleading. Each section is as much a vehicle for as many pictures of her stupid face in all the boho-plutocrat happenstance as the very Internet will sustain. Sadly, the Internet is built to withstand an awful fucking lot of pictures of lantern-jawed brunettes, and this deleterious narcissism will persist forever.